A continuation of answering and following up on some of the
questions I have discussed in earlier posts on this blog.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
After working through my O'Leary family in California, I went looking for Other O'Learys in Ireland. I found more siblings for my great grandmother Lizzie O'Leary than I had expected, and wasn't able to find a brother I had found in my San Francisco research -- Arthur O'Leary. I've still had a puzzle finding him and figuring out his story. I know he was living in San Francisco in 1904 because his name appears on Lizzie's immigration record, but I couldn't figure out his address or find him in the city directory. He's referenced again in Ellen O'Leary Ford's death notice in 1932. I did receive some information from one of my Coleman cousins that Arthur was adopted and eventually settled in Portland, OR where he ran a mill. If he was adopted, that might explain the difficulty in finding him in the birth and baptismal records for Ireland. My cousin also said he was the youngest sibling, which would mean he was likely born after 1880. That would mean he was in his early 20s when he arrived in San Francisco. This is another research point I need to revisit.
I still haven't worked out most of the rest of the siblings either. I was able to find John and his family in the Irish census records for 1901 and 1911. The other siblings who remained in Ireland are still difficult to locate. I did revisit the record I found for Jeremiah O'Leary, Jr. in the 1901 census to see if I was mistaken on my first assessment once I learned that John's wife's name was Hanora. I thought the Hannah O'Leary listed as that Jeremiah's sister might possibly be a sister-in-law, but when it said she wasn't married, I eliminated them again.
I may have found a death record in New York for Jeremiah, but I will need to order the death certificate to be certain.
Irish records are challenging in two ways. First is knowing if a record actually exists as so many records have been lost and destroyed over the years. The second is the more obvious problem that the records that do exist are in Ireland. The internet is great for identifying a lot of possible records, but most of what is available on line is a limited index of records found in Ireland. More and more are becoming available on line, but Ireland's privacy laws are a bit stricter than those in the US so what is available is more limited. Add in to the complication that I really need to know more about 20th century records so I can go back further makes working on the O'Leary/Coleman side of the family more challenging.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The Baptismal Records were more promising. While I've not been able to confirm my findings (again, the challenges of records in Ireland), I do think they're good leads. I did realize I had mis-recorded the year of birth for Bartholomew Coleman. I had noted him as having been born in 1880 rather than 1870, so I went back to the baptismal records to see if he turned up when I entered the correct year. No such luck. A new source has come on line recently that makes it easier to scroll through the images, but I've only done a cursory check there. The best part of this is that it includes records from all over Ireland rather than just a few counties. While being able to identify my Murray/Mullane ancestors through these records is a long-shot since I still don't have parish information (or even county information for the Mullane side) and they were all born in the 1840s and it's hit or miss for records still existing for those years. Still, it's something I can try to sort through for possible leads.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The Arrival of Lizzie O'Leary is the lone success I've had to date in finding immigration records for any of my ancestors. Of course, she's the most recent immigrant on record. Having arrived in the US in 1904 and coming through Ellis Island made her record much easier to find. I suspect that I may have reasonable luck finding Daniel Coleman in the records since he arrived sometime between 1892-1900. I thought perhaps I'd be able to find him traveling with his brother John, but according to the 1900 census, John arrived in 1877 -- well before Daniel. That John was already in the US is a helpful point though as it could prove useful in finding Daniel. The other immigrant points for the Murray/Mullane side, however, are going to be much more challenging. They all arrived in the 1860s or so and the records that are available from that time are pretty sparse. There are loads of passenger records, but the information gathered was pretty much name, age, occupation, and country of origin. Not knowing where my ancestors landed upon leaving Ireland means checking all major ports on the east coast as well as San Francisco on the off chance they emigrated directly to California. It's also possible they arrived in Canada before the US since both Canada and Ireland were part of the British Empire in the 1860s, so those are records to consider as well. That's a lot of haystacks to search through for a handful of needles!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
When I figured out What Happened to Mollie, I hadn't been able to find an article in the Oakland Tribune about the accident. I was only able to find a small blurb on the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle. The Tribune for 1917 has since become available on line, and I was able to find another small blurb about what happened. Though this story was on page 4 rather than page 1, it had a bit more information. It identified Mollie's husband as "Charles W. Johnson, a stevedore, 986 Stanford Avenue" which lines up with what I have already found. The story also mentions that Mollie had run out to the a nearby store and didn't return and that "it is thought she became confused in the rain and stepped in front of the train." That definitely puts more context on what happened.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
This concludes my blog review and hopefully helps bring some of the stories more life. It's definitely helped me remember points of interest I need to go back to and other roads I need to follow up on in my research. I've also been very lax at keeping this blog updated over the past few years, so I'm going to try to make a concerted effort to write more often, even if I only have observations of the process of research rather than results.
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Answering and Reviewing Some Questions, Part 1
I realized that over the four years since I started this blog I had posed a bunch of different questions that I may have not answered in a follow up post, so I decided to go back through the 40 or so posts I have written and see what I may have forgotten to update. I'll also try to put in quick links to questions that were answered in case something was missed. This will be a multi-part post and one that will appear from time to time as I move along in my research since I suspect there will be more instances of me plowing ahead and forgetting to update all the answers I find and/or forgetting to go back and look at some other questions.
The First Month of Digging brought up a lot of questions and I think I've answered most of them by now. Some questions, like what happened to my Murray family relatives during and immediately following the 1906 earthquake and fire will probably remain a mystery. That kind of information is usually found in family stories and I know of none. Many of the other questions that I pondered in that first month have been answered though.
When did they come to California is another partially answered question. Based on what I've been able to find in the San Francisco city directories and the 1900 census record has given me a rough estimate. In the 1900 census, Bridget shows up as having arrived in the US in 1866. I first find her with a certainty in the 1867 city directory working at the Occidental Laundry. However I also found a Bridget McDonough working at the Russ House laundry in 1864 with several other McDonoughs. I'm not 100% sure that's "my" Bridget, so I've put that record in my "maybe" file for now. John Murray first shows up in the city directories in 1862 working at Easton's laundry. So I have a reasonable timeline for both of them arriving in California. But what about the question of when they arrived in the United States? While it's possible they both emigrated from Ireland directly to California, it's more likely they arrived in the US on the east coast before moving across the country. I haven't, to date, found any definitive records of the arrival of either Bridget or John. The best lead I have is for Bridget as her death notice asked that papers in Chelsea, Massachusetts be notified. That leads me to believe there was some kind of family in Massachusetts and that Bridget may have landed in Boston before moving west. As for John -- that's definitely going to be a needle in haystack. John Murray is a common enough name and the immigration records of the 1860s contain very little information that would allow me to identify one John Murray from another with any certainty. The most interesting part of this question though gives rise to another question. If John and Bridget arrived on the east coast sometime between 1860-1866, what was traveling across the entire continent in the middle of the US Civil War like?
The question of what happened to my great grandfather's older brother John Henry is another open question. I only have spotty records for him. After finding him living with the rest of the family in 1900-01, I have very little hard evidence on him. He witnessed my great grandparents' wedding in 1918 and I know he's buried at Holy Cross Cemetery with his brother Joseph, so I know he died in 1930. Those are the only hard records I have for him. Again, with a name like John Murray, it's a bit tricky tracking him down. I have a couple of possibilities in census records, but nothing definite.
I haven't quite found all of the Murrays in the 1910 census. Bridget and Nellie (Ella) have died by 1910 and I'm pretty sure I've found Mollie living with her husband. The brothers, however, are a bit more of a challenge. I have a reasonable guess for Joseph, but nothing for either Marshall or John Henry, so that's one area I need to keep looking.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The Mystery of Mary Mullane introduced me to my first real puzzler of the family -- that my great grandmother was married to someone named Denis Edward Hayes before she married my great grandfather Marshall. Edward Hayes seems to have dropped out of the records after the 1910 census and I haven't a clue what happened to him. Based on what I do know, I'm guessing Edward Hayes abandoned my great grandmother sometime around 1910. My great grandparents weren't married until 1918, four years after my grandfather was born and the information my great grandmother provided for the marriage license wasn't entirely truthful. Both of those facts lead me to believe Edward Hayes ran off. I haven't put a bunch of effort in to tracking him down, but do have some potential leads to follow up. The best of those is from the 1940 census which has an Edward Hayes who is the right age and divorced living at the Napa State Hospital, but with such a big gap between records I can't be certain I've got the right person. And, like Joseph Murray's wife Agnes, has me wondering what put him in the state hospital in the first place!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
More McDonoughs was my first lead on some possible relatives of my great-great grandmother Bridget McDonough Murray. I found a Patrick McDonough living near the Murrays in the 1880 census and other searches turned up a Thomas and Betsey McDonough working with a Bridget McDonough at the Russ House in 1864. I haven't spent much time on the McDonoughs recently, so I haven't found any connection between any of these people to my great-great grandmother. I did spend some time on them when they first turned up then set it aside for a few months. When I went back and took a look at the work I'd done, I discovered I'd made several mistakes and gotten different families mixed up so had to scrap a lot of what I did and go back to the beginning. I think what I've gathered to date is accurate, but it is pretty limited and I've as yet to make any connections.
The First Month of Digging brought up a lot of questions and I think I've answered most of them by now. Some questions, like what happened to my Murray family relatives during and immediately following the 1906 earthquake and fire will probably remain a mystery. That kind of information is usually found in family stories and I know of none. Many of the other questions that I pondered in that first month have been answered though.
- What was Bridget's husband's name? When did he die?
- Who is Joseph's wife? Why isn't she living with him in 1920?
- What happened to Mary and Nellie? Did they marry?
- Who were my great-grandmother's parents? Did she have any siblings?
When did they come to California is another partially answered question. Based on what I've been able to find in the San Francisco city directories and the 1900 census record has given me a rough estimate. In the 1900 census, Bridget shows up as having arrived in the US in 1866. I first find her with a certainty in the 1867 city directory working at the Occidental Laundry. However I also found a Bridget McDonough working at the Russ House laundry in 1864 with several other McDonoughs. I'm not 100% sure that's "my" Bridget, so I've put that record in my "maybe" file for now. John Murray first shows up in the city directories in 1862 working at Easton's laundry. So I have a reasonable timeline for both of them arriving in California. But what about the question of when they arrived in the United States? While it's possible they both emigrated from Ireland directly to California, it's more likely they arrived in the US on the east coast before moving across the country. I haven't, to date, found any definitive records of the arrival of either Bridget or John. The best lead I have is for Bridget as her death notice asked that papers in Chelsea, Massachusetts be notified. That leads me to believe there was some kind of family in Massachusetts and that Bridget may have landed in Boston before moving west. As for John -- that's definitely going to be a needle in haystack. John Murray is a common enough name and the immigration records of the 1860s contain very little information that would allow me to identify one John Murray from another with any certainty. The most interesting part of this question though gives rise to another question. If John and Bridget arrived on the east coast sometime between 1860-1866, what was traveling across the entire continent in the middle of the US Civil War like?
The question of what happened to my great grandfather's older brother John Henry is another open question. I only have spotty records for him. After finding him living with the rest of the family in 1900-01, I have very little hard evidence on him. He witnessed my great grandparents' wedding in 1918 and I know he's buried at Holy Cross Cemetery with his brother Joseph, so I know he died in 1930. Those are the only hard records I have for him. Again, with a name like John Murray, it's a bit tricky tracking him down. I have a couple of possibilities in census records, but nothing definite.
I haven't quite found all of the Murrays in the 1910 census. Bridget and Nellie (Ella) have died by 1910 and I'm pretty sure I've found Mollie living with her husband. The brothers, however, are a bit more of a challenge. I have a reasonable guess for Joseph, but nothing for either Marshall or John Henry, so that's one area I need to keep looking.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
The Mystery of Mary Mullane introduced me to my first real puzzler of the family -- that my great grandmother was married to someone named Denis Edward Hayes before she married my great grandfather Marshall. Edward Hayes seems to have dropped out of the records after the 1910 census and I haven't a clue what happened to him. Based on what I do know, I'm guessing Edward Hayes abandoned my great grandmother sometime around 1910. My great grandparents weren't married until 1918, four years after my grandfather was born and the information my great grandmother provided for the marriage license wasn't entirely truthful. Both of those facts lead me to believe Edward Hayes ran off. I haven't put a bunch of effort in to tracking him down, but do have some potential leads to follow up. The best of those is from the 1940 census which has an Edward Hayes who is the right age and divorced living at the Napa State Hospital, but with such a big gap between records I can't be certain I've got the right person. And, like Joseph Murray's wife Agnes, has me wondering what put him in the state hospital in the first place!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
More McDonoughs was my first lead on some possible relatives of my great-great grandmother Bridget McDonough Murray. I found a Patrick McDonough living near the Murrays in the 1880 census and other searches turned up a Thomas and Betsey McDonough working with a Bridget McDonough at the Russ House in 1864. I haven't spent much time on the McDonoughs recently, so I haven't found any connection between any of these people to my great-great grandmother. I did spend some time on them when they first turned up then set it aside for a few months. When I went back and took a look at the work I'd done, I discovered I'd made several mistakes and gotten different families mixed up so had to scrap a lot of what I did and go back to the beginning. I think what I've gathered to date is accurate, but it is pretty limited and I've as yet to make any connections.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
The Arrival of Lizzie O’Leary
I knew from previous
findings that my great grandmother Lizzie O’Leary had arrived in the United States some time between
March 31, 1901 (when she appears in the Irish Census) and July 12, 1904 (when
Daniel and Lizzie’s marriage license was issued.) Several of the US Census records had her arriving in 1904, which
seemed to be my best bet for a starting point when I decided to look and see if
I could find her immigration record.
![]() |
| SS Umbria, the ship Lizzie O'Leary sailed on from Ireland to New York (ancestry.com) |
It didn’t take too long
for me to find the record at Ancestry.com once I tried looking for Lizzie
O’Leary rather than Elizabeth. Up
popped her record arriving at Ellis Island on June 6, 1904 on the Cunard line
ship the Umbria which set sail
for New York on May 29 from Queenstown (now Cobh) Ireland. I would image that Lizzie caught a train
from New York to San Francisco shortly thereafter.
The passenger manifest had some very useful information beyond Lizzie’s travel information. According to the manifest, Lizzie was 28 years old, a dressmaker who had last lived in Ballinsloe. Her brother had paid for her passage and she had at least $50 with her. The most interesting fact, however, was what relative or friend she was going to join. Rather than listing her fiancĂ© Daniel Coleman, she listed her brother Arthur O’Leary! Ok then, that backed up my suspicion that Arthur had also moved to San Francisco and was likely why I couldn’t find him in the Irish census records.
The passenger manifest had some very useful information beyond Lizzie’s travel information. According to the manifest, Lizzie was 28 years old, a dressmaker who had last lived in Ballinsloe. Her brother had paid for her passage and she had at least $50 with her. The most interesting fact, however, was what relative or friend she was going to join. Rather than listing her fiancĂ© Daniel Coleman, she listed her brother Arthur O’Leary! Ok then, that backed up my suspicion that Arthur had also moved to San Francisco and was likely why I couldn’t find him in the Irish census records.
| Address for Arthur O'Leary on passenger manifest (ancestry.com) |
I’m having a hard time
corresponding the address listed for Arthur O’Leary in the passenger manifest
with any of the Arthur O’Learys I’ve looked up in the San Francisco City
Directories. The address on the
manifest looks like 83 “Asnoy” Street or maybe “Amoy” Street, neither of which
exist in San Francisco. I thought it
might be Army Street, but there is no one named O’Leary living on Army Street
in the 1903-1905 city directories. I’ve
run through the list of streets starting with the letter “A” in the city
directories to see if anything else makes sense, but nothing does so far. Ditto for any one named O’Leary – none of
the addresses look like anything that could be mistaken for “Asmoy.” More puzzles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
